What is checked, what is deliberately not, and why the difference matters.
Generated from the repository, and needed only when you are implementing the protocol outside Aumos. Writing a package needs neither page.
Every check below is a statement about your manifest or about the payloads you return. None of them reads your code, because the inside of an manager is treated as opaque — which is the only way a suite can judge a harness written in another language, or one whose responses were recorded a year ago.
| Check | What it establishes | Requirement |
|---|---|---|
manifest-valid | Manifest validates against AMP/1 | §7, roadmap §#145 |
immutable-version | Declares an immutable version | §23, §43 |
declares-skills | Declares required Skills | §43 |
declares-permissions | Declares permissions as capabilities | §37, §43 |
no-broker-write | Requests no broker write capability | §36, invariant 5 |
network-declared | Declares a network policy | §38 |
timegate-clean-context | No invocation carries context dated after its asOf | invariant 6, #147 |
produces-decision-proposal | Every response carries a schema-valid DecisionProposal | §10, §11, §43 |
protocol-declared | Every response declares AMP/1 | §8 |
echoes-invocation-id | Every response echoes its invocationId | §10 |
no-direct-broker-execution | No response contains an execution instruction | §36, §43 |
language-costs-nothing-structural | A non-English `language` does not change the wire format | AMP/1 `language`, §26 |
supports-wait | Reaches a non-mutating judgement when nothing is available | §11, invariant 4 |
wait-is-reasoned | A do-nothing judgement is fully argued | §11, invariant 4 |
watch-carries-trigger | A WATCH names what it is watching for | §11 |
moving-action-names-a-target | A judgement that moves the book names a target | §12, §13 |
skills-used-declared | Reported skill usage stays within the declared set | §37, §43 |
It does not check that your prose came back in the requested language. Doing so means running a language detector and scoring you on our detector's accuracy, with no view inside your implementation to settle a disagreement. A check that is wrong some of the time is worse than no check, because a failing row reads as your fault. What it checks instead is the half that actually breaks: a non-English request must cost nothing structurally.
It also does not judge whether your decisions are any good. Six runs establish nothing about that, and pretending otherwise is what a forward track record exists to replace.
The reference implementation is the smallest thing that passes. It reasons about nothing — it answers WATCH when it has an event and a thesis to attach one to, and WAIT otherwise, which is the honest answer for something that does no analysis — but it is an executable definition of "conformant" to diff against.
AMP/1 CONFORMANT — aumos/basic-investor@0.2.3
✓ manifest-valid Manifest validates against AMP/1
aumos/basic-investor@0.2.3
✓ immutable-version Declares an immutable version
0.2.3 is exact — a track record can be attached to it
✓ declares-skills Declares required Skills
requires 1 skill(s)
✓ declares-permissions Declares permissions as capabilities
2 capability declaration(s), all within the AMP/1 enum
✓ no-broker-write Requests no broker write capability
No execution capability requested — and the enum has no way to spell one
✓ network-declared Declares a network policy
deny — all data access goes through the Skill Gateway, where the TimeGate can see it
✓ timegate-clean-context No invocation carries context dated after its asOf
7 invocation(s) clean; runtime enforcement is the Skill Gateway's (#147)
✓ produces-decision-proposal Every response carries a schema-valid DecisionProposal
7/7 response(s) valid
✓ protocol-declared Every response declares AMP/1
all 7 enveloped response(s) declare AMP/1
✓ echoes-invocation-id Every response echoes its invocationId
no response could be mistaken for another run
✓ no-direct-broker-execution No response contains an execution instruction
Proposals express portfolio intent only; orders are the Planner’s to construct
✓ language-costs-nothing-structural A non-English `language` does not change the wire format
1 non-English case(s) returned the same wire format; the prose language itself is not judged here — §5 leaves no view inside a manager to settle a disagreement with a language detector
✓ supports-wait Reaches a non-mutating judgement when nothing is available
answered WAIT on the excluded symbol
✓ wait-is-reasoned A do-nothing judgement is fully argued
every WAIT/WATCH carried reasons and risks
✓ watch-carries-trigger A WATCH names what it is watching for
every WATCH armed at least one trigger
✓ moving-action-names-a-target A judgement that moves the book names a target
1 judgement(s) moved the book, naming 2 target(s) each; `target` and `targets` are read as one list, `target` first, later entries winning
✓ skills-used-declared Reported skill usage stays within the declared set
7 response(s) reported skill usage, all declared